Recently a grave error was committed by the
management of the Bhaktivedanta Manor towards its devotee community. About a
week back or so devotees may have seen a video circulating on social media of
H.H. Bhakti Purushottama Swami speaking in the Mayapur temple about how scores
of devotees contracted the corona virus after a funeral and a series of
programs held in the UK for a departed Vaisnava.
After he passed away several programs were
arranged for H.G. Sruti Dharma Das with many devotees attending on 12th
March as follows; 11:30am to 1:45pm at the Sri Krishna Haveli at Bhaktivedanta Manor, was
Antima-sraddhanjali, or kirtan, offering flowers and final respects. The
second, from 3 to 4pm at Saint Marylebone Crematorium in London, was the Antyeṣṭi-kriyā,
or Ceremony of Cremation and lastly
kirtan, from 7 to 9pm at the Sri Krishna Haveli. Further evenings of kirtan were
planned at the same time for Friday, and Saturday, after and from 4 to 9pm on
Sunday.
This means that there
were 3 public programs held on that day and I am not sure if programs on the
other days went ahead also. In order to put things in proper perspective
regarding the Corona virus pandemic at the time, the timeline for the spread of
the virus in the UK is given below:
31st January – first case of Corona in the UK
31st January – first case of Corona in the UK
Early Feb – more cases
28th Feb – Transmission of
Corona within UK
1 March – England, Wales, N. Ireland,
Scotland had cases
3rd March – Declared as a level
4 emergency, which means coordinated at national level
11th March – WHO declared Corona
a PANDEMIC. Some schools choose to close. A number of flight
cancellations announced by airlines. Some retail outlets announce unusually
large orders (hoarding).
12th March – The level of risk
was raised in the UK from moderate to HIGH.
From January 2020 Vishakha Devi Dasi took over as the temple president. So she either planned or approved the programs held. Based on the progression of events above, how could anyone have organized public programs on 12th March in this dangerous circumstance and risk the lives of the lotus-like devotees? Devotees are not cheap but are very rare in this material world and dear to Krishna. We are meant to serve them and honour them, not risk their lives like this. The ISKCON NEWS site reported in this regard;
From January 2020 Vishakha Devi Dasi took over as the temple president. So she either planned or approved the programs held. Based on the progression of events above, how could anyone have organized public programs on 12th March in this dangerous circumstance and risk the lives of the lotus-like devotees? Devotees are not cheap but are very rare in this material world and dear to Krishna. We are meant to serve them and honour them, not risk their lives like this. The ISKCON NEWS site reported in this regard;
“The spread of the virus amongst the
UK devotee community can be traced back largely to the March 12th funeral and
March 15th memorial of Bhaktivedanta Manor temple president Srutidharma Das –
the former of which drew about 1,000 people.”
ISKCON NEWS 3rd
April 2020
To put it plainly
Vishakha Devi Dasi is responsible for the so far 5 deaths relating to Corona
that took place and the 21 confirmed (maybe more now) infection cases. How many
more will have to leave us?
The management or she
may argue that it was before the restrictions on movement and social and
religious gatherings were imposed by the UK govt, but the point here is lack of
proper care and concern for devotees. We don’t need the government to tell us whether
to risk the lives of the devotees. She most definitely would have known the
situation concerning the corona virus and yet had no qualms putting all those
children, women and old people, and the preaching mission at great risk by
arranging or allowing the gatherings.
The devotee community has been engaged in preaching and they have made great achievements over the years holding phenomenal programs, bringing in new devotees and distributing books etc. Among the devotees who left due to corona infection related deaths were some exceptional devotees who did tremendous service for the Manor community.
The temple president’s role is not a light one just for prestige or fame, it has a very big responsibility attached with it. The whole congregation is in his, or in this case, her charge. The senior leaders of the UK yatra now owe it to the devotees to remove Vishakha Devi Dasi from the post of Temple President. This is for the safety of the lives of the congregation and the future of the Manor preaching mission. The temple President must be in tune with the goings on in the area and the world and have genuine concern for the devotees or it can lead to disaster. These incidents and their fallout has shown that she does not have the qualities to lead this great community and we cannot risk any further issues. We still don’t know how many more will end up leaving us. Actually in karmi society such a case of loss of lives would most certainly lead to litigation and perhaps this will need to be done if they do not agree to replace her.
The devotee community has been engaged in preaching and they have made great achievements over the years holding phenomenal programs, bringing in new devotees and distributing books etc. Among the devotees who left due to corona infection related deaths were some exceptional devotees who did tremendous service for the Manor community.
The temple president’s role is not a light one just for prestige or fame, it has a very big responsibility attached with it. The whole congregation is in his, or in this case, her charge. The senior leaders of the UK yatra now owe it to the devotees to remove Vishakha Devi Dasi from the post of Temple President. This is for the safety of the lives of the congregation and the future of the Manor preaching mission. The temple President must be in tune with the goings on in the area and the world and have genuine concern for the devotees or it can lead to disaster. These incidents and their fallout has shown that she does not have the qualities to lead this great community and we cannot risk any further issues. We still don’t know how many more will end up leaving us. Actually in karmi society such a case of loss of lives would most certainly lead to litigation and perhaps this will need to be done if they do not agree to replace her.
Comments
Post a Comment