By Nadiya Sasidhara Das
Snippet: The GBC has shown over the years that their decisions are unfortunately very often not based on Srila Prabhupada’s books and teachings and not based on Guru, Sadhu and Sastra (see list given below this article).
In
December 2013 the GBC EC released a document on Dandavats (a GBC owned website)
which they termed; ‘A GBC Foundational Document’, authored by Ravindra Svarupa
Dasa, a member of the GBC (but retired since 2014). The GBC said that they
fully endorsed the document. In the beginning of this document is a note from
the GBC EC which elaborates on the position of Srila Prabhupada as the founder
acharya and in a central role in the movement and stated that keeping Srila
Prabhupada in that position in our movement is the main purpose of this
document.
However,
we also find that the document contains statements to the effect that the GBC
is not just the highest managerial authority in ISKCON but also the spiritual
successor to Srila Prabhupada. Srila Prabhupada is the founder acarya of ISKCON
and thus his teachings are (or should be) the main instruction for guiding the
movement.
So
the GBC saying that it is the spiritual successor to Srila Prabhupada means that
it should be following Srila Prabhupada on all philosophical points and
spiritual decisions. We have seen though that this is not the case. Also,
consider the following points:
·
The GBC has shown over the years that
their decisions are unfortunately very often not based on Srila Prabhupada’s
books and teachings and not based on Guru, Sadhu and Sastra (see list given
below this article).
·
Srila Prabhupada disbanded the GBC at
least once for their incompetence. After Srila Prabhupada’s time all the GBC
members were reviewed for qualifications of their roles in 1987, after some of
them had difficulties in their spiritual practice.
·
The GBC has made serious errors and thus
caused serious problems within ISKCON, many of them still plaguing our society.
·
Srila Prabhupada formed the GBC for
managing ISKCON and overseeing spiritual standards he set and never said that
their say in spiritual issues should be followed. It makes sense that for
spiritual matters guidance should be taken from spiritually elevated and
sastrically inclined devotees who may or may not be on the GBC.
We
are not saying that we are perfect and never make mistakes. Everyone except
perfectly liberated souls makes mistakes from time to time (Bg 15.16). However
we have to realize our position and not try and place ourselves on a higher
position than we are thus causing confusion and difficulties in the society of
devotees. We should especially not try and usurp the place of Srila Prabhupada.
It is also imperative that a body with as much responsibility as the GBC with
an important function in ISKCON and the global Vaisnava society, constantly
observe their actions and decisions and assess whether they are indeed
traveling on the course that they set out to.
Srila
Prabhupada setup the GBC for governing ISKCON, but considering the first three
points above, how can we accept any guidance from the current GBC anymore? It
should be noted that we are not opposed to the institution of the GBC per say
but rather we are opposed to its improper functioning. In 1986 after three
members of the GBC fell down from spiritual practice a fifty man committee was
convened in the next meeting in 1987 to assess the remaining members and their
capacity for carrying out their duty as GBC members. Therefore we see that the
idea of holding the GBC accountable is not unprecedented. Even before that
Srila Prabhupada disbanded the GBC at least once, no doubt due to its improper
functioning.
For
the attention of the devotees, and to elaborate on my points above we have
included a list below which chronicles the numerous deviations, misconceptions
and blunders that the GBC has been promoting, carrying out or neglecting to
correct. Research into this area uncovered an alarming amount of deviations, personal
agendas, neglect and incompetence that resulted in serious problems in ISKCON
today, most of which are still plaguing our society. Even the main task
of the GBC which was to oversee and maintain spiritual standards has largely
been abandoned with many GBC members themselves displaying gross violations of
conduct such as sannyasis closely associating with women, maintaining luxurious
apartments in the Vrindavan and Mayapura dhams, introducing mundane welfare
work etc.
Has
the time now come to disband the GBC, assess the qualification of its members
and its mission as given by Srila Prabhupada? I would think so, and judging
from the increasing volume of articles published on online websites and social
networks wherein devotees are now expressing their dissatisfaction en mass with
the GBC as well as the growing list of their deviations, it seems like a lot of
devotees in ISKCON also think the same way. I let the reader judge for himself
though after studying the list below and seeing the seriousness of the
situation.
There
is an English saying that ‘a problem realized is half the problem solved’. We
appeal to concerned devotees to forward any entries that they feel are not on
this list including the dates and relevant details so that we can cover
everything and begin collectively seeing the next course of action towards
getting back our purity by returning to an ISKCON with a leadership based
strictly on Srila Prabhupada’s books (as he desired). We urge everyone to
participate. This is for the future of our movement. Please send your entries
to; Nadiya sasadhara Das [magicblue27@yandex.com].
1.
The Robin George lawsuit.
(1976)
2.
The GBC is unbalanced in that it
gives too much weight to the unproductive and regressive zones like North
America (GBC NA) so that their failed policies are pushed on India and rest of
the world, like Russia, which is now having the same problems. (1977 to
the present)
3.
Supporting so many fallen GBCs,
Gurus, Sannyasis, even with evidence in hand that should have spurred action;
(Kirtanananda Swami, Jayatirtha Swami, Hansadutta Swami, Bhavananda Swami,
Hridayananda Swami, Radhanath Swami, Sacinandana Swami… The list is very large
and across 40 years); (1977
4.
Not giving proper importance to
the gurukula system thus allowing rampant child abuse to take place and killing
the soul of ISKCON children. (1977)
5.
The ongoing deplorable child abuse
situation; (1977 to date)
6.
Mismanaging the Hyderabad farm
such that by not following Srila Prabhupada’s specific instruction (he really
knew trust law) we ended up losing 525 acres of land which is now prime
land worth several crores/acre. (1977 to the present)
7.
Pradyumna Prabhu, Srila
Prabhupada’s Sanskrit editor, wrote a letter to the GBC warning them not to
imitate Srila Prabhupada and do what turned out to be the Zonal Acarya fiasco.
Not only was he ignored but the GBC sent a group of “Storm Troops” headed by
Hrdayanand das Goswami to verbally and politically attack him and succeeded in
driving him out of Vrndavana and ISKCON. The predictions in his letter came out
to be true to the letter and in 1998, 20 years after the fact and after all the
damage was done they the sent him a letter of apology. (1977 – 78)
8.
Politicking to bring B.V. Narayan
in as Acarya; (ended in 1995)
9.
The Zonal Acarya System and their
reliance on the July 9th Letter to support it; (1978 -1986)
10.
The Eleven Acarya selection or
“Guru Board” constitution/creation in 1978.
11.
The Acarya Committee ; constant
changes in definitions, including; definitions of ‘ultimate managing
authority’; (1977 to present).
12.
Going to Sridhar Swami of the
Gaudiya Math for advice; ( 1978-1982)
13.
Not dealing strongly or in a
timely manner with Hrdayananda Das Goswami which has led to a litany of
problems. (1980’s to present)
14.
The GBC resolution that Bhavananda
could resume initiating if for six months he wasn’t caught having homosex.( Mid
1980’s)
15.
The sale of the Manhattan Temple,
New York, ISKCON’s Flagship temple with 12 storeys (1983)
16.
The Bhavananda scam and vote to
retain him as Guru/GBC in (1985)
17.
Totally mismanaging their zones so
that in the vast majority of temples in North and South America (other places
too) there are more Deities than devotees at mangala arotika when previously
the temples were full, and yet wanting to tell other successful zones like
ISKCON India how to manage their zones by implementing their same failed
policies. (1986 to the present)
18.
Compromising with secular and
degenerative modernisitic values. (Mid 1990’s to the present)
19.
Creating the GBC deputies, several
of whom are women, and who as gate keepers of the GBC strongly determine what
the GBC votes on. (mid 1990’s)
20.
Formally using the term “Prabhu”
for women in all their work and thus creating unnecessary conflict in ISKCON.
(1990’s to date)
21.
Creating the incompetent
CPO. (1990’s to date)
22.
Allowing Bhakti Tirtha Swami to
publish his UFO Mothership/Atlantis/MU books. (Mid to late 1990s to 2005).
23.
Bringing the corrupt New Vrindaban
crowd back into ISKCON; (1993 (NV came back)), (1994-95).
24.
Allow Vaisnava Advanced Studies
(VAST) a private forum on COM/PAMHO organized and led by Hrdayanada Das
Goswami, a breeding ground for blasphemy of Srila Prabhupada to exist. (1995
onward).
25.
Creating the Women’s Ministry, an
obvious feminist agency in ISKCON. Now tactfully named Vaisnavi Ministry.(
1996)
26.
Not allowing the Bureau to take
pre-emptive action against Madhu Pandit Das. (1998)
27.
Allowing a Hospital to be opened
in what clearly seems like an ISKCON project and even promoting it. (1998)
29.
Creating female GBCs, which Srila
Prabhupada never did and even indirectly spoke against. Even though GBC’s are
supposed to be exemplary in sadhana and practice of Krsna consciousness, the
following shows how this is not the case for one of the female GBC’s. See links one, two and three. (1999 and
again in 2010)
30.
No action taken against Bir
Krishna Goswami for allowing all the cows at Murari Sevak to be sold for
slaughter while he was GBC for the place. (1999)
31.
The Turley lawsuit. (1999)
32.
The official GBC websites like
Dandavats, www.krishna.com and
especially iskconnews.org are
all run by Westerners and promote a Euro-USA centric vision of ISKCON and
actively suppress anything promoting traditional Vedic values by not publishing
them, mocking them or putting them in a dusty corner where they are
simultaneously published and not published. (2006 to present)
33.
Doing nothing to stop growth of
sahajiyaism and mayavada in ISKCON (early 2000’s to the present).
34.
Not dealing strongly or in a
timely manner with Sacinandana Swami and thus undermining the Sannyasa asrama
of ISKCON. ( 2000’s to the present )
35.
Supporting veganism and other
anti-milk policies. (2000)
36.
Women’s resolution of 2000
37.
Allowing the OXFORD Project to be
created. It promotes a secular, feminist viewpoint. (Late 90s early
2000s).
38.
Not promoting book distribution
and in fact trying to stop it (NAGBC). (2002)
39.
Creating Bhaktivedanta College in
Radhadesha which is affiliated with karmi schools in direct violation of Srila
Prabhupada’s instructions to not get accreditation from government bodies.
(2002)
41.
Allowing the promotion of Female
Diksha Gurus and creating serious fractures in ISKCON to the point that we are
almost at the gates of schism. This is particularly an unwarranted action of
the NA GBC. (2003 to the present).
42.
Long Island lawsuit; (2006) (?)
43.
Mayapur GBC com creation and
mismanagement. (2008 - 2016)
44.
Annotations and footnote
resolution of 2009 – rescinded but only because the BBT didn’t allow it.
45.
GBC trying to take over the Bureau
which is a separate autonomous trust created by Prabhupada to be the legal
authority for ISKCON India. It is an autonomous trust like the BBT. It is not
under GBC control. (2011 to the present).
46.
GBC banning the word “Varnashrama”
and instead people like Annuttama Das pushing for US style egalitarianism - he
publicly said it at a NA GBC meeting. (Around 2015)
47.
Allowing non-Gaudiya sampradayic
influences in, particularly the Sri vaisnavas in N.A.; (2015) (?)
48.
Current New York temple problems
with impending temple sale; (2016)
49.
Passing a resolution stating that
the the book Women: Masters or Mothers? misrepresents the teachings of Srila Prabhupada and then
mistakenly banning it then unbanning it then not issuing an apology to the
author or clearly defining why they consider it a misrepresentation of Srila
Prabhupada’s teachings. (2016).
50.
Shifting the Deities from Belfast
to Leicester. (2016) (its not an international GBC move/action - but did
involve the GBC global minister for Deity worship - who approved).
51.
Ravindra's recent paper and the
flagrant mis-characterization of His Divine Grace. (2016)
52.
Allowing Mundane Welfare work to
be done by ISKCON centres and even GBC members.
53.
Special treatment of Satsvarupa
Das Goswami
54.
The Gopi Bhava Club;
55.
Not implementing Varnasrama (1977
to the present)
56. Their current support of
GBC’s who associate with mayavadis, perform demigod
worship and write questionable books.
57.
Allowing the mayavada influence to
not only creep, but now flow unimpeded into ISKCON;
58.
Developing Mayapur in a way
different from Srila Prabhupada desired.
59.
Seeing ISKCON gradually coming to
be identified as a Hindu organization in western countries (and even India)
which only preaches to Indians and Hindus.
60.
ISKCON Gurukulas metamorphosis
into mundane schools, e.g. Vrindavana Gurukula turned into ICSE board school,
going specifically against Srila Prabhupada’s instruction to not do so and yet
claiming that Srila Prabhupada founded this mundane school.
61.
Years of strategic planning by the
GBC and thousands of hours and dollars spent with nothing to show for it.
62. Creation of the SABHA, which was supposed to be a check and
balance for the GBC but is actually a front for the social Marxist agenda
because it is stuffed with loose and broken links in the parampara. Most are sastrically
illiterate and support the FDG agenda and now want to promote LGBT culture into ISKCON.
63. Female Diksha Guru resolution on
15th October 2019
This list of deviations can
be used for future articles analyzing the malaise of ISKCON. We hope to write
systematically on each one of them and catalog all these deviations with the
aim of drawing attention to them and correcting them.
This article was born out of the
alarm the author felt after hearing of the GBCs approval of FDG as shown in
point 63 above, and out of concern for ISKCON and the increasingly deviated
path of the GBC away from Srila Prabhupada’s teachings. It should be emphasized
that the author fully supports the GBC institution as introduced and instituted
by Srila Prabhupada, but is against their current mode of operation, which is
divorced from Srila Prabhupada’s books and guru, sadhu and sastra.
For submitting more entries to
this list of GBC blunders, please contact Nadiya Sasadhara Das.[magicblue27@yandex.com].
The list is overly incomplete until you catalogue the blunders committed and allowed to be committed by the GBC in relationship to the changing editing, and modifying all ofof Srila Prabhupada's books. In the same line formation of the corporation BBTI and for the most part dissolving the Trust Srila Prabhupada formed.... BBT.
ReplyDeletediategle-bo Ben Follette https://wakelet.com/wake/FaEMzc9oiWy_rHaLdf2Ie
ReplyDeletefraslandlopa
Nclusinden Shannon Baker Website
ReplyDeleteESET NOD32 Internet Security
Kerish Doctor
bandmadmipha