yoṣito nāvamanyeta na cāsāṁ viśvased-budhaḥ|
na caiverṣyurbhavet tāsu nādhikuryāt-kadācana
yoṣitaḥ—Women;
na-avamanyeta—should
never insult; na ca—nor should; āsām—on her; viśvased—put faith; budhaḥ—an
intelligent man; na ca eva—and nor should; īrṣyuḥ—envious
of; bhavet—should
become; tāsu—of
her; na-adhikuryāt—neither
should appoint her; kadācana—at any time
A wise
man should never insult women, nor should he
trust them. He
should never become
jealous of women, nor should he ever appoint them. (Hari Bhakti
Vilasa 11.708)
Commentary by Sanatana Gosvami on this verse:
nādhikuryāt strībhyo ‘dhikāraṁ na dadyād-ityarthaḥ |
nādhikuryāt here
means that one should not
give authority to
women.
[Note:
Above verse is talking about devotee women as Haribhakti-vilasa is meant for
the devotees]
Despite
such repeated warnings by Sastras like the Hari-bhakti-vilasa and the
Manu-samhita; by Sadhus like the other Vaisnava Sampradayas, and the guru,
Srila Prabhupada, top leaders of ISKCON nonetheless formed the women’s ministry
and instituted the practice of appointing women as temple presidents, GBCs,
etc.
Recently there was a meeting of DEVI
(Devotional Empowerment Voluntary Initiative) "with the aim of
empowering, connecting, protecting and inspiring women and girls in its
community."
DEVI, through the Temple Council and board of trustees
ensures that there are no barriers to women serving in management roles at
Bhaktivedanta Manor and monitors this to enable women to serve in any capacity
“according to their desire and inclination”. (Source: http://www.dandavats.com/?p=80723)
Currently
there are two women on the GBC and in the GBC college there are now women being
trained as GBCs. Some GBC deputies are women.
Besides that there are female temple
presidents: for instance one of the major temples of our movement, the
Bhaktivedanta Manor, London, has appointed Her Grace Vishakha Devi Dasi as
temple president.
There are also women who lead the sastric
training of devotees and leaders. For instance one of the leaders of Vrindavana Institute
of Higher Education (VIHE) is Prashanta Devi Dasi. Chair person of the Sastric Advisory
Committee (SAC), which is the sastric advisor of the GBC, is Urmilla Devi
Dasi.
Women being appointed in such positions has
lead ISKCON to go again and again on the path of adharma by taking adharmic
decisions.
By what phenomenon do women, when among leaders,
affect dharmic decisions? Let us see...
Sastras
say:
- Even though one knows what is right, one still will do wrong due to the effect of lust or rajoguna (BG 3.37, kama esa krodha esa rajo-guna samudbhavah)
- Discrimination is on the platform of intelligence. So loss of intelligence comes before one falls down (BG 2.63, buddhi nasat pranasyati)
- Sitting with women makes even the most intelligent person lose his intelligence (SB 5.19.18, vidvamsam api karsati)
- Thus, in the meetings, decision making committee, and any such posts there should not be any women, otherwise the men who are constantly sitting with them will also lose intelligence and how can one make sastric and dharmic (right) decisions with lost intelligence. (Hari Bhakti Vilasa 11.708, stribhyo adhikaram na dadyat)
- Currently GBC has 2 women members and Sabha has 8 women members. You can now understand why they do not understand that guru-sadhu-sastra should be the basis of our decisions (Vidvamsam-api karsati)
- Indian Bureau, ICC, or IIAC don’t have any female member in them. You can clearly see the difference, at least crystal clear difference in the matter of discussions on Female Diksa Gurus
For Quotes see below:
BG 2.62-63
dhyāyato viṣayān puṁsaḥ saṅgas teṣūpajāyate |
saṅgāt sañjāyate kāmaḥ kāmāt krodho ‘bhijāyate ||
krodhād bhavati sammohaḥ sammohāt smṛti-vibhramaḥ |
smṛti-bhraṁśād buddhi-nāśo buddhi-nāśāt praṇaśyati||
While contemplating the objects of the
senses, a person develops attachment for them, and from such attachment lust
develops, and from lust anger arises. From anger, complete delusion arises, and
from delusion bewilderment of memory. When memory is bewildered, intelligence
is lost, and when intelligence is lost one falls down again into the
material pool.
SB
5.6.3, purport
In the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (9.19.17) it
is specifically stated:
mātrā svasrā duhitrā vā nāviviktāsano bhavet |
balavān indriya-grāmo vidvāṁsam api karṣati ||
A gṛhastha,
vānaprastha, sannyāsī and brahmacārī should be very careful when associating
with women. One is
forbidden to sit down in a solitary place even with one’s mother, sister or
daughter. In our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement it has been
very difficult to disassociate ourselves from women in our society, especially
in Western countries.[1] We are therefore sometimes criticized,
but nonetheless we are trying to give everyone a chance to chant the Hare Kṛṣṇa
mahā-mantra and thus advance spiritually. If we stick to the principle of
chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra offenselessly, then, by
the grace of Śrīla Haridāsa Ṭhākura, we may be saved from the
allurement of women. However, if we are not very strict in chanting the Hare
Kṛṣṇa
mahā-mantra, we may at any time fall victim to women.[2]
SB
9.19.18
mātrā svasrā duhitrā vā nāviviktāsano bhavet |
balavān indriya-grāmo vidvāṁsam api karṣati ||
TRANSLATION
One should not allow oneself to sit on
the same seat even with one’s own mother, sister or daughter, for the senses
are so strong that even though one is very advanced in knowledge, he may be
attracted by sex.
PURPORT
Learning the etiquette of how to deal
with women does not free one from sexual attraction. As specifically mentioned
herewith, such attraction is possible even with one’s mother, sister or daughter.
Generally, of course, one is not sexually attracted to his mother, sister or
daughter, but if one allows himself to sit very close to such a woman, one may
be attracted. This is a psychological fact. It may be said that one is liable
to be attracted if he is not very advanced in civilized life; however, as
specifically mentioned here, vidvāṁsam api karṣati:
even if one is highly advanced, materially or spiritually, he may be attracted
by lusty desires. The object of attraction may even be one’s mother, sister or
daughter. Therefore, one should be extremely careful in dealings with women. Śrī
Caitanya Mahāprabhu was most strict in such dealings, especially after He
accepted the sannyāsa order. Indeed, no woman could come near Him to offer Him
respect. Again, one is warned herewith that one should be extremely careful in
dealings with women. A brahmacārī is forbidden even to see the wife of his
spiritual master if she happens to be young. The wife of the spiritual master
may sometimes take some service from the disciple of her husband, as she would
from a son, but if the wife of the spiritual master is young, a brahmacārī is
forbidden to render service to her.
[1]
Note the incapability Srila Prabhupada is
expressing in separating sexes although he very much wants that
[2] ISKCON liberals always forget this line; they take just the line before
this one. However, in reality this line is in effect today. Top leaders of
ISKCON have fallen victim to women and thus their intelligence to make dharmic
decisions is lost
Hare Krishna. How did you all like the article? Do you find it logical? Your comments are welcome.
ReplyDelete--- The Author
Your article is very sarcastic but well versed, making things clear from scriptures. I would suggest that, in future, you be softer in your presentation; afterall GBCs and ISKCON leaders are also Vaishnavas and they do not need to be bashed as we bash karmis. They are intelligent enough to understand from the polite hints and knowledge that you supply to them.
DeleteBrahmanas do speak truth in a polite way and then leave on the ksatriyas and managers to implement. They are not attached to what they have to say.
>> Brahmanas do speak truth in a polite way and then leave on the ksatriyas and managers to implement.
DeleteAns: That is not the fact. Brahmanas see that dharma is going on. Sometimes they do act like in case of Maharaja Vena.
>> They are intelligent enough to understand from the polite hints and knowledge that you supply to them.
These methods have already been resorted to for last 20 years but to no avail. If you would have been in email discussion threads between Madana Mohana, Damodara Das, Hridayananda Gosvami, all GBCs, and all ISKCON leaders during the time of Annual GBC meetings at Mayapur in 2019, you would have easily understood how polite and understanding they are. I was following all the discussions.
Also India Bureau clearly sent a notice to the GBC in Feb 2019, just before Mayapur AGM to not pass any resolution for FDGs without discussing it first with the Indian Bureau. GBC did not give a fig to it (not even saying that they are not going to discuss) and went on with the resolution.
DeleteHow would you speak about such leaders? Do you still think "They are intelligent enough to understand from the polite hints and knowledge that you supply to them?"